Re: index prefetching
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index prefetching |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobosbwUekt15RtRseMd-Y_Zv2rUWjCq+ZSwDwXy7sFvUg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index prefetching (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:25 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > 3. It doesn't perform prefetch of leave pages for IOS, only referenced > > heap pages which are not marked as all-visible. It seems to me that if > > optimized has chosen IOS (and not bitmap heap scan for example), then > > there should be large enough fraction for all-visible pages. Also index > > prefetch is most efficient for OLAp queries and them are used to be > > performance for historical data which is all-visible. But IOS can be > > really handled separately in some other PR. Frankly speaking combining > > prefetch of leave B-Tree pages and referenced heap pages seems to be > > very challenged task. > > I see prefetching of leaf pages as interesting / worthwhile improvement, > but out of scope for this patch. I don't think it can be done at the > executor level - the prefetch requests need to be submitted from the > index AM code (by calling PrefetchBuffer, etc.) +1. This is a good feature, and so is that, but they're not the same feature, despite the naming problems. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: