Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobUW9NQK7EJkV_0F87bqqq5BSHKiX2+wfthLcy4qA7YvQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 3:08 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > smgrcreate() as we would for most WAL records or whether it should be > adopting the new system introduced by > 49d9cfc68bf4e0d32a948fe72d5a0ef7f464944e. I wrote about this concern > over here: > > http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYcUPL+WOJL2ZzhH=zmrhj0iOQ=iCFM0SuYqBbqZEamEg@mail.gmail.com > > But apart from that question your adaptations here look reasonable to me. That commit having been reverted, I committed v6 instead. Let's see what breaks... -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: