Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobNkdKTF02dCYMnXgEGte3_r4ubDpp4efYi7BzHMf9=zw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 04:39:27PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > AFAIR any transaction that modifies catalogs gets sync commit forcibly, >> > regardless of the setting. And sync commit means you get to wait for >> > all previous transactions to be flushed as well. So simply creating a >> > temp table ought to do the trick ... >> >> I don't think there's a carve-out for system tables ... but creating a >> temp table with synchronous_commit=on will certainly do the trick. > > What is a temp table writing to WAL? The pg_class/pg_attribute changes? Yes. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: