Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121105214256.GJ19099@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables
Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 04:39:27PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > AFAIR any transaction that modifies catalogs gets sync commit forcibly, > > regardless of the setting. And sync commit means you get to wait for > > all previous transactions to be flushed as well. So simply creating a > > temp table ought to do the trick ... > > I don't think there's a carve-out for system tables ... but creating a > temp table with synchronous_commit=on will certainly do the trick. What is a temp table writing to WAL? The pg_class/pg_attribute changes? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: