Re: [HACKERS] replace GrantObjectType with ObjectType
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] replace GrantObjectType with ObjectType |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoazavRw_S913cNMdNeLV3SBgfU-em5fttSfQJZnd0JPuQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] replace GrantObjectType with ObjectType (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] replace GrantObjectType with ObjectType
Re: [HACKERS] replace GrantObjectType with ObjectType |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 12/14/17 22:59, Rushabh Lathia wrote: >> I noted that no_priv_msg and not_owner_msg array been removed >> and code fitted the code into aclcheck_error(). Actually that >> makes the code more complex then what it used to be. I would >> prefer the array rather then code been fitted into the function. > > There is an argument for having a big array versus the switch/case > approach. But most existing code around object addresses uses the > switch/case approach, so it's better to align it that way, I think. > It's weird to have to maintain two different styles. Eh, really? What about the two big arrays at the top of objectaddress.c? (This is just a drive-by comment; I haven't looked at the details of this patch.) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: