Re: Small patch: Change calling convention for ShmemInitHash (and fix possible bug)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Small patch: Change calling convention for ShmemInitHash (and fix possible bug) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoagyCi_Oqen3KisK-_W8JO-v2YLuocAOa4UVkwoeDr_Hg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Small patch: Change calling convention for ShmemInitHash (and fix possible bug) (Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Small patch: Change calling convention for
ShmemInitHash (and fix possible bug)
Re: Small patch: Change calling convention for ShmemInitHash (and fix possible bug) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > I would like to continue discussion regarding changing calling > convention for ShmemInitHash procedure: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZm=Uowt8a_XaSfooGwufeeLJ861NTADiCEOpyFehV8Wg@mail.gmail.com > > Currently this procedure has two arguments --- init_size and max_size. > But since shared hash tables have fixed size there is little sense to > pass two arguments. In fact currently ShmemInitHash is always called > with init_size == max_size with only one exception, InitLocks procedure > (see lock.c), which I believe is actually a bug. No, I think we left it that way on purpose. I don't remember the discussion exactly, but I don't think it's hurting anything. > Patch is attached. > > What do you think? I don't think this actually buys us anything. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: