Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoad81=i=r-5emz1itMg9ymQ0P7vG6ROqPw-540tmrvXWw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf (Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Since we haven't yet come up with a reasonable way of machine-editing >> postgresql.conf, this seems like a fairly serious objection to >> getting >> rid of recovery.conf. I wonder if there's a way we can work around >> that... > > Well, we *did* actually come up with a reasonable way, but it died under an avalanche of bikeshedding and "we-must-do-everything-the-way-we-always-have-done". I refer, of course, to the "configuration directory" patch, which wasa fine solution, and would indeed take care of the recovery.conf issues as well had we implemented it. We can *still*implement it, for 9.2. Well, I find that a fairly ugly solution to the problem, but I agree that it is solvable, if we could get a critical mass on any some particular solution. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: