Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
От | Joshua Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1890970288.45435.1316893787828.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Since we haven't yet come up with a reasonable way of machine-editing > postgresql.conf, this seems like a fairly serious objection to > getting > rid of recovery.conf. I wonder if there's a way we can work around > that... Well, we *did* actually come up with a reasonable way, but it died under an avalanche of bikeshedding and "we-must-do-everything-the-way-we-always-have-done". I refer, of course, to the "configuration directory" patch, which wasa fine solution, and would indeed take care of the recovery.conf issues as well had we implemented it. We can *still*implement it, for 9.2. > pg_ctl start -c work_mem=8MB -c recovery_target_time='...' This wouldn't survive a restart, and isn't compatible with init scripts.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: