Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f"
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaYzAbrObqd9x7LfudC=3mo8tB6j_5qheSe0U6LQqjjfg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f" (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > Dear PostgreSQL developers, > > Plese find attached a patch so that: > > Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f" > > Make psql --single-transaction option work on a non-interactive > standard input as well, so that "psql -1 < input.sql" behaves as > "psql -1 -f input.sql". > > This saner/less error-prone behavior was discussed in this thread back in > June: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg00785.php > > I have tested it manually and it works for me. I'm not sure this is the best > possible implementation, but it is a small diff one. I haven't found a place > in the regression tests where "psql" could be tested with different options. > Did I miss something? I'm wondering if perhaps -- in addition to what you've done here -- we should make "psql -1" error out if reading from a terminal. Because accepting options that are intended to cause important behavior changes and then ignoring those options is Bad. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: