Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f"
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120808225022.GA13591@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f" (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > > Dear PostgreSQL developers, > > > > Plese find attached a patch so that: > > > > Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f" > > > > Make psql --single-transaction option work on a non-interactive > > standard input as well, so that "psql -1 < input.sql" behaves as > > "psql -1 -f input.sql". > > > > This saner/less error-prone behavior was discussed in this thread back in > > June: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg00785.php > > > > I have tested it manually and it works for me. I'm not sure this is the best > > possible implementation, but it is a small diff one. I haven't found a place > > in the regression tests where "psql" could be tested with different options. > > Did I miss something? > > I'm wondering if perhaps -- in addition to what you've done here -- we > should make "psql -1" error out if reading from a terminal. +1 for this. > Because accepting options that are intended to cause important > behavior changes and then ignoring those options is Bad. Yes, It Is. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: