Re: Commitfest Update
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commitfest Update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZSBNhX0zCkG5T5KiQize9Aq4+ec+uqLcfBhm_+12MbQA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commitfest Update (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commitfest Update
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:11 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > This reminds me of a point I've been meaning to bring up: it seems to > often happen that someone adds their name as reviewer, but then loses > interest and doesn't do anything more with the patch. I think that's > problematic because people see that the patch already has a reviewer > and look for something else to do. Would it be feasible or reasonable > to drop reviewers if they've not commented in the thread in X amount > of time? In theory, this might cause someone who made a valuable contribution to the discussion to not get credited in the commit message. But it probably wouldn't in practice, because I at least always construct the list of reviewers from the thread, not the CF app, since that tends to be wildly inaccurate in both directions. So maybe it's fine? Not sure. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: