Re: Commitfest Update
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Commitfest Update |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 549603.1648735901@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Commitfest Update (Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Commitfest Update
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> writes:
> In my experience, re-applying an updated patch to a new CF is very easy.
> You can re-attach the existing discussion thread. The only information that
> can be lost is CF-specific fields like reviewer/author which is worth
> re-adding manually.
Yeah. In fact, it might be a good idea to intentionally *not* bring
forward the old reviewers list, as they may have lost interest.
This reminds me of a point I've been meaning to bring up: it seems to
often happen that someone adds their name as reviewer, but then loses
interest and doesn't do anything more with the patch. I think that's
problematic because people see that the patch already has a reviewer
and look for something else to do. Would it be feasible or reasonable
to drop reviewers if they've not commented in the thread in X amount
of time?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: