Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZJRzL4aVdVSyY8ivcWzb6YXwZ0s8N6PRMVFeRGhg2BLQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended
consequences
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> I'm OK with adding a note either to the 9.0 docs only (which means it >> might be missed by a 9.0 user who only looks at the current docs) or >> with adding a note to all versions mentioning the difference in >> behavior with 9.0, but I'm not really sure which way to go with it. >> Or we could just not do anything at all. Anyone else have an opinion? > > It seems to be somewhat of a burden to carry a version-specific note > indefinitely... more clutter than helpful. So I'd vote for just changing > the 9.0 docs. > > Or, we could add the 9.0-specific note to 9.0 and 9.1 docs, but leave it > out of 'master'. That way it sticks around for a while but we don't have > to remember to remove it later. Having thought about this a bit further, I'm coming around to the view that if it isn't worth adding this in master, it's not worth adding at all. I just don't think it's going to get any visibility as a back-branch only doc patch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: