Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1313087143.12350.6.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I'm OK with adding a note either to the 9.0 docs only (which means it > might be missed by a 9.0 user who only looks at the current docs) or > with adding a note to all versions mentioning the difference in > behavior with 9.0, but I'm not really sure which way to go with it. > Or we could just not do anything at all. Anyone else have an opinion? It seems to be somewhat of a burden to carry a version-specific note indefinitely... more clutter than helpful. So I'd vote for just changing the 9.0 docs. Or, we could add the 9.0-specific note to 9.0 and 9.1 docs, but leave it out of 'master'. That way it sticks around for a while but we don't have to remember to remove it later. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: