Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYQzFoy6vtqVjEufESm__KWcdvGCzJgmtgCB2eraYv4fA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On 04/26/2016 06:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> You removed the kudos to other upcoming stuff that is outside of core. I >>> think that is a mistake. We are an inclusive community. Including tips to >>> users about awesome stuff that uses PostgreSQL is a good thing. A press >>> release that pushes our inclusiveness as a point, is a very good thing. >> >> >> I'm not sure about that. I think that other products can make their >> own announcements on pgsql-announce; our beta announcement should be >> just that. > > > If it is a product, yes but I do believe (within conservative reason) that > highlighting upcoming stuff shows we collaborate. Granted it should never be > "the reason" for the announcement but a little enthusiastic collaboration on > cool Pg utilities? Heck yeah :) > > Logical decoding for users, is useless without PgLogical (right now). Why > wouldn't we mention it? > > PgAdmin is *the default* GUI admin tool and version 4 is a major milestone, > why wouldn't we mention it? > > PgBackrest is *the* most talked about backup utility we have, why wouldn't > we help invigorate that community? I am not opposed to promoting those things; I just don't think it belongs in the beta announcement. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: