Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYL_GC=1OSpPFW=Qz_LVe6_y0x2qQ=GSgEx2NpFKYhPNw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It has a lot of sense.  Without it, it's very difficult to do logical
>> replication on a table with no primary key.
>>
>> (Whether or not people should create such tables in the first place
>> is, of course, beside the point.)
>
> I am not against to functionality - I am against just to syntax DELETE
> FROM tab LIMIT x
>
> because is it ambiguous what means: DELETE FROM tab RETURNING * LIMIT x

What's ambiguous about that?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: column name of pg_stat_replication.backend_start
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests