Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus

On lör, 2012-04-14 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> It has a lot of sense.  Without it, it's very difficult to do logical
> >> replication on a table with no primary key.
> >>
> >> (Whether or not people should create such tables in the first place
> >> is, of course, beside the point.)
> >
> > I am not against to functionality - I am against just to syntax DELETE
> > FROM tab LIMIT x
> >
> > because is it ambiguous what means: DELETE FROM tab RETURNING * LIMIT x
> 
> What's ambiguous about that?

I suppose one could wonder whether the LIMIT applies to the deleting or
just the returning.