Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> This isn't software, it is docs. It is ridiculous to suggest we break this
> up into 3-4 patches. This is a small doc patch to a single doc file
> (backup.sgml).

I don't think it's ridiculous, but you can certainly disagree.

>> superuser privileges; it's the selective-dump case where you can often
>> get by without them.  I've attached a proposed patch along these lines
>> for your consideration.
>
> That's fair.

Should I go ahead and apply that portion, then?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company