Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch

On 11/08/2013 06:04 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> This isn't software, it is docs. It is ridiculous to suggest we break this
>> up into 3-4 patches. This is a small doc patch to a single doc file
>> (backup.sgml).
>
> I don't think it's ridiculous, but you can certainly disagree.
>
>>> superuser privileges; it's the selective-dump case where you can often
>>> get by without them.  I've attached a proposed patch along these lines
>>> for your consideration.
>>
>> That's fair.
>
> Should I go ahead and apply that portion, then?

I am certainly not opposed.




-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms   a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats