Re: Enabling Checksums
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYJPoADz2bRtZ0y_JynWGB5PaBuYLceKY=V1M+Aue7QZQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Enabling Checksums
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> We've had a few EnterpriseDB customers who have had fantastically >> painful experiences with PostgreSQL + ZFS. Supposedly, aligning the >> ZFS block size to the PostgreSQL block size is supposed to make these >> problems go away, but in my experience it does not have that effect. >> So I think telling people who want checksums "go use ZFS" is a lot >> like telling them "oh, I see you have a hangnail, we recommend that >> you solve that by cutting your arm off with a rusty saw". > > Wow, what platform are you using ZFS on? > > (we have a half-dozen clients on ZFS ...) Not us, customers. But as to platform, I have yet to run across anyone running ZFS on anything but Solaris. I'd be interested to hear your experiences. Mine rhyme with "sun a play dreaming". -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: