Re: Enabling Checksums
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5137CDF7.9060707@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/06/2013 03:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> We've had a few EnterpriseDB customers who have had fantastically >>> painful experiences with PostgreSQL + ZFS. Supposedly, aligning the >>> ZFS block size to the PostgreSQL block size is supposed to make these >>> problems go away, but in my experience it does not have that effect. >>> So I think telling people who want checksums "go use ZFS" is a lot >>> like telling them "oh, I see you have a hangnail, we recommend that >>> you solve that by cutting your arm off with a rusty saw". >> >> Wow, what platform are you using ZFS on? >> >> (we have a half-dozen clients on ZFS ...) > > Not us, customers. But as to platform, I have yet to run across > anyone running ZFS on anything but Solaris. I'd be interested to hear > your experiences. Mine rhyme with "sun a play dreaming". I would guess he meant on X86_64 or Sparc. JD > -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC @cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: