Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY2G7NgkCSafQ32hLaA77zbK9g3c6MPfsGr=Czhw1bivA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/03/10 9:10, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote: >>>> I updated the patch. Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in >>>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on >>>> partitioned tables at all. >>> >>> This patch no longer applies. >> >> Rebased patch is attached. > > Oops, really attached this time, Committed with a bit of wordsmithing of the documentation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: