Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2a750dc8-511c-41f9-33a9-6526a57ab81f@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/03/27 23:40, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Amit Langote > <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> On 2017/03/10 9:10, Amit Langote wrote: >>> On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote: >>>>> I updated the patch. Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in >>>>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on >>>>> partitioned tables at all. >>>> >>>> This patch no longer applies. >>> >>> Rebased patch is attached. >> >> Oops, really attached this time, > > Committed with a bit of wordsmithing of the documentation. Thanks. Regards, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: