Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Dave Page's message of vie jul 29 10:13:50 -0400 2011:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> writes:
>> >> /postgres-9.1/share/doc/html/manage-ag-overview.html
>> >> In the folowing partagrasoh 'recommendable' should be 'recommended'.
>> >
>> > Seems perfectly ok as-is to me ...
>>
>> Sounds hideous to me. I ran it past one of our tech writers (Susan
>> Douglas), who rewrote the sentence as:
>>
>> If a single PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or users
>> that should be separate (for the most part unaware of each other), we
>> recommend storing them in separate databases.
>
> Except that we don't use the first person in docs, do we?

That's easily changed.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company