Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxowfAjgd5cb9yLRxsK1ZWAYzJoPnSwpM+4yFOzwjh7Ttwg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> >> On 10/03/2011 12:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> > >> > I was never exactly thrilled with the separate-config-directory design >> > to start with, so I'm probably not the person to opine on whether we >> > could get away with removing it. >> > >> > >> >> The horse has well and truly bolted. We'd have a major row if anyone >> tried to remove it. Let's not rehash old battles. Our only option is to >> make it work as best we can. > > I disagree. If people were using it we would have had many more bug > reports about pg_ctl not working. Debian/ubuntu packages and our own project infrastructure use it. Though, there is a non-trivial script wrapping it, presumably to try to make it work properly, and handle side-by-side installations of different major versions. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: