Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201110031815.p93IFlm28727@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 10/03/2011 12:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > I was never exactly thrilled with the separate-config-directory design > > to start with, so I'm probably not the person to opine on whether we > > could get away with removing it. > > > > > > The horse has well and truly bolted. We'd have a major row if anyone > tried to remove it. Let's not rehash old battles. Our only option is to > make it work as best we can. I disagree. If people were using it we would have had many more bug reports about pg_ctl not working. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: