Re: [pgadmin-support] "pgadmin4" - slow?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgadmin-support] "pgadmin4" - slow? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxowEMMQP0Gr=YMoY_odhquZFRyx6qvVnwPPFDO_fwqrCNg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [pgadmin-support] "pgadmin4" - slow? ("David Lloyd" <lloy0076@adam.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgadmin-support] "pgadmin4" - slow?
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Mike Surcouf <mikes@surcouf.co.uk> wrote: > Static resources will be good for caching :-) I would expect to see performance gains when using remotely via a browser. Thankyou. > I'm not sure whether QtWeb will benefit as much as its local traffic so round trips should be pretty instantaneous. > Unless QtWeb is horribly inefficient in which case I hope it helps. Right - and on Windows, I think that is actually the problem which is why users have reported that running the server separately and using a regular browser makes a big difference. FYI, when I was testing on Windows over the weekend, in my test VM, simply changing "localhost" as the connection target in the runtime to "127.0.0.1" took the startup time from ~34 seconds to ~24. I lost count of how many times I tested that, but it was pretty consistent. That hints to me that the network side is what is less performant - obviously the resolver, but I suspect also connection setup which is why I have high hopes for web packing. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: