Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqEZNGG_g2pq-+tTFhj7cqbPtbBRL6Ycgfu_F2t+-ZyWgw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:23 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > Forking this thread for two tangential patches which I think are more > worthwhile than the original topic's patch. > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200207143935.GP403%40telsasoft.com > > Is there a better place to implement assertion from 0002 ? I would think the answer to that would be related to the answer of why you think we need this assert in the first place? I know I have made the mistake of not updating relnatts when I added relispartition, etc. to pg_class, only to be bitten by it in the form of seemingly random errors/crashes. Is that why? Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: