Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Дата
Msg-id BB9631F3-1411-4535-BE71-B3FDDBDFF949@decibel.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Robert Bernier <robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca>)
Ответы Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  ("Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
On Aug 28, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Robert Bernier wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007 11:06, Dave Page wrote:
>> Decibel! wrote:
>>> I think we can just as easily make the change without any real
>>> fanfare
>>> at all.
>>
>> I'm inclined to agree. For the most part we could all just slowly
>> change
>> things to 'Postgres'. I doubt anyone would really notice, except we'd
>> get fewer people getting it wrong!
>
> How about a vote?
>
> How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0'
> reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work
> involved out of the debate for the moment)?

I vote we just make the change without any fuss, ASAP. But I'll take
any kind of change over sticking with PostgreSQL.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)



В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Следующее
От: Guillaume Lelarge
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)