Re: Usability improvment ideas
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Usability improvment ideas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTimjD+g9dMtjRM9mxFtzXs5fe5K8NQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Usability improvment ideas (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Список | pgadmin-support |
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > On 05/16/2011 09:57 AM, Dave Page wrote: >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>> Le 05/13/2011 06:03 PM, Dave Page a écrit : >>>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Belbin, Peter <Peter.Belbin@paetec.com> wrote: >>>>> Just an observation..... :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> With the 1.14 stream of pgadmin3, I notice that the dialog for creation of columns moves the type to a different tabthan the name, requiring much more work to create the columns. >>>> >>>> That does seem like a usability regression Guillaume. Can you look at >>>> that please? >>> >>> Yeah, but it means we'll lose the consistency. I know it doesn't feel >>> right, but if we allow the type to be on the first tab, we'll get lots >>> of request for that kind of thing for $object. >> >> I'm normally the first guy to bleat about consistency, but this really >> does feel like a big regression in usability to me - this is one of >> the few (the only?) dialog that people are likely to open over and >> over again when creating another object. We already know that is >> cumbersome (that's why there's a complete redesign of the table >> dialogue on the TODO) - this will make it worse. >> > > Done. Actually, I had to move three fields (datatype, length, and > precision). Thanks. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: