Re: Usability improvment ideas
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Usability improvment ideas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DD2CC2E.7060200@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Usability improvment ideas (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Usability improvment ideas
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
On 05/16/2011 09:57 AM, Dave Page wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Le 05/13/2011 06:03 PM, Dave Page a écrit : >>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Belbin, Peter <Peter.Belbin@paetec.com> wrote: >>>> Just an observation..... :) >>>> >>>> >>>> With the 1.14 stream of pgadmin3, I notice that the dialog for creation of columns moves the type to a different tabthan the name, requiring much more work to create the columns. >>> >>> That does seem like a usability regression Guillaume. Can you look at >>> that please? >> >> Yeah, but it means we'll lose the consistency. I know it doesn't feel >> right, but if we allow the type to be on the first tab, we'll get lots >> of request for that kind of thing for $object. > > I'm normally the first guy to bleat about consistency, but this really > does feel like a big regression in usability to me - this is one of > the few (the only?) dialog that people are likely to open over and > over again when creating another object. We already know that is > cumbersome (that's why there's a complete redesign of the table > dialogue on the TODO) - this will make it worse. > Done. Actually, I had to move three fields (datatype, length, and precision). -- Guillaumehttp://www.postgresql.frhttp://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: