Re: Identifying no-op length coercions
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Identifying no-op length coercions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BANLkTim8Ofi8jfLUCVQJdFXpoUVAxbcpwQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Identifying no-op length coercions (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Identifying no-op length coercions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:57:13PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> > Sounds good. ?Updated patch attached, incorporating your ideas. ?Before applying
>> > it, run this command to update the uninvolved pg_proc.h DATA entries:
>> > ?perl -pi -e 's/PGUID(\s+\d+){4}/$& 0/' src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h
>>
>> This doesn't quite apply any more. I think the pgindent run broke it slightly.
>
> Hmm, I just get two one-line offsets when applying it to current master. Note
> that you need to run the perl invocation before applying the patch. Could you
> provide full output of your `patch' invocation, along with any reject files?
Ah, crap. You're right. I didn't follow your directions for how to
apply the patch. Sorry.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: