Re: Identifying no-op length coercions
От | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Identifying no-op length coercions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110619030624.GB14646@tornado.leadboat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Identifying no-op length coercions (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Identifying no-op length coercions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:57:13PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > Sounds good. ?Updated patch attached, incorporating your ideas. ?Before applying > > it, run this command to update the uninvolved pg_proc.h DATA entries: > > ?perl -pi -e 's/PGUID(\s+\d+){4}/$& 0/' src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h > > This doesn't quite apply any more. I think the pgindent run broke it slightly. Hmm, I just get two one-line offsets when applying it to current master. Note that you need to run the perl invocation before applying the patch. Could you provide full output of your `patch' invocation, along with any reject files? Thanks, nm
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: