Re: Review: psql include file using relative path
От | Josh Kupershmidt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: psql include file using relative path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTikdmfGeHHFKqqz3tvmM+BNbdCHJCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: psql include file using relative path (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review: psql include file using relative path
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> > wrote: > Tweaks applied, but omitted the C variable names as I don't think that adds > much value. Your rewordings are fine, but the the article "the" is missing in a few spots, e.g.* "uses \ir command" -> "uses the \ir command"* "to currently processing file" -> "to the currently processingfile"* "same as \i command" -> "same as the \i command" I think "processing" is better (and consistent with the rest of the comments) than "processed" here: + * the file from where the currently processed file (if any) is located. > New version of the patch attached. Thanks for the review. I think the patch is in pretty good shape now. The memory leak is gone AFAICT, and the comments and documentation updates look good. Josh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: