Re: Review: psql include file using relative path
От | Gurjeet Singh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: psql include file using relative path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTi=eW_nUH9195=9uPqF7Treg4UH7-g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: psql include file using relative path (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review: psql include file using relative path
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
Attached an updated patch.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
> wrote:> Tweaks applied, but omitted the C variable names as I don't think that addsYour rewordings are fine, but the the article "the" is missing in a
> much value.
few spots, e.g.
* "uses \ir command" -> "uses the \ir command"
* "to currently processing file" -> "to the currently processing file"
* "same as \i command" -> "same as the \i command"
I think "processing" is better (and consistent with the rest of the
comments) than "processed" here:
+ * the file from where the currently processed file (if any) is located.I think the patch is in pretty good shape now. The memory leak is gone
> New version of the patch attached. Thanks for the review.
AFAICT, and the comments and documentation updates look good.
Attached an updated patch.
If you find it ready for committer, please mark it so in the commitfest app.
Thanks,
--
Gurjeet Singh
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: