Re: Discussion - Search Objects
От | Ashesh Vashi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTi=gOD+B4Fjy=wTCy_zjAMvDAvD5Og@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Discussion - Search Objects (Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin.dizdarevic@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin.dizdarevic@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/6/16 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:No, see dlgFindAndReplace.
> Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject,
> because all of them modifies something.
> When I started working I had no clear picture about the class
> hierarchy and I thought this would be an easier entry point. I can
> change the prefix if this is wished.
>Yeah, I think it would be better.I'm going to change that.
> btw: You could help me with the factory class. Am I starting the
> dialog correctly?
>Seems good to me. My only question is: why in frmMain.ccp and not in
frmSearchObject.cpp? I first tried the latter, and was surprised to find
it in the former.I'm currently surprised myself ;)BTW, can you stop top-posting please? Thanks.
Regards.I'll try it.One more thing:Can somebody say me how to merge different patches to a single one? I've made 3-4 commits and would like to have exactly one patch file. It's not so important, but it would be very nice.
Hope - this will help:
git log -p -n <number_patches> --author=jasmin > <patch_file>
Generally, I wanna thank you for your patience and help - I know this can be frustrating to answer questions, that are clear to you since a long time :)--
--
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: