Re: Discussion - Search Objects
| От | Jasmin Dizdarevic |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BANLkTi=HyL6nW6+LR2Ye6j+xGvS4XZwM7w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Discussion - Search Objects (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
| Список | pgadmin-hackers |
2011/6/16 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:No, see dlgFindAndReplace.
> Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject,
> because all of them modifies something.
> When I started working I had no clear picture about the class
> hierarchy and I thought this would be an easier entry point. I can
> change the prefix if this is wished.
>Yeah, I think it would be better.
I'm going to change that.
> btw: You could help me with the factory class. Am I starting the
> dialog correctly?
>Seems good to me. My only question is: why in frmMain.ccp and not in
frmSearchObject.cpp? I first tried the latter, and was surprised to find
it in the former.
I'm currently surprised myself ;)
BTW, can you stop top-posting please? Thanks.
Regards.
I'll try it.
One more thing:
Can somebody say me how to merge different patches to a single one? I've made 3-4 commits and would like to have exactly one patch file. It's not so important, but it would be very nice.
Generally, I wanna thank you for your patience and help - I know this can be frustrating to answer questions, that are clear to you since a long time :)
--
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: