Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX
От | Adam H.Pendleton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B7676A38-E6F9-11D7-B514-000A9566CE14@fmonkey.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX ("Stefan Csomor" <csomor@advancedconcepts.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sunday, Sep 14, 2003, at 12:41 US/Eastern, Stefan Csomor wrote: > Hi > > basically we have two options : > > I have implemented unicode for wxMac a few weeks ago with one > restriction : > > for 10.2 we need the Metrowerks Compiler environement, since their > C-runtime > supports wchar, whereas Apple's Dev Tools don't , rewriting wxMac to > use > apple's own unicode support at the moment for me is out of the > question due > to time constraints > > for 10.3 we can work with the apple developer tools > > So I guess it would be the easiest way to go for 10.3 only... > Hmmm. Well, I don't have the Metrowerks compiler, but I could probably get my hands on it if I needed to. I am not using Mac OS X 10.3, but I probably could if I needed to (though I don't know how this would help us). What is needed to get wxMac to support Apple's Unicode on 10.2? Is there anything I can do to help? I've got the time, but I don't know the particulars about what would need to be done. I don't think that supporting 10.3 only is a good idea, only because 10.3 is still in beta, and would be just a useful as producing no Mac port at all. OTOH, I can take a look at getting a Metrowerks compiler to produce binary snapshots. Dave, what do you think? ahp
Вложения
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: