Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinzEP8KO6h5Zi18EzSwC9S-aa92YJccpW79g+so@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote: > On 10/04/2010 05:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a >> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C >> || D). > > Good point. > > Can the proposed standby registration configuration format cover such a > requirement? Well, if you can name the standbys, there's no reason there couldn't be a parameter that takes a string that looks pretty much like the above. There are, of course, some situations that could be handled more elegantly by quorum commit ("any 3 of 5 available standbys") but the above is more general and not unreasonably longwinded for reasonable numbers of standbys. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: