Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CAA2ED6.6030000@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: standby registration
Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a >>> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C >>> || D). >> Good point. If this is the only feature which standby registration is needed for, has anyone written the code for it yet? Is anyone planning to? If not, it seems like standby registration is not *required* for 9.1. I still tend to think it would be nice to have from a DBA perspective, but we should separate required from "nice to have". -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: