Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTintU_j-9kkz+iKwNPbm+u9t8ahEiT+1qsr=+f6R@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 24/08/2010 13:01, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> >>> wrote: >>>> This "disqualifies" pgAdmin3 from quite a lot of platforms. There >>>> aren't that many that are on 8.4+ yet :-( >>> >>> If the packagers are willing to update pgAdmin to 1.12, it seems >>> highly likely that they'll also update their PostgreSQL package to >>> 8.4+ too. The distros with a conservative update policy (like Debian >>> Stable) won't update either. >> >> It's probably going to make it very hard for a backports repository to >> carry it though :( But I guess it could keep a backport of libpq as >> well, since it's always backwards compatible. >> > > Can't we just have it set a variable we could check with a #ifdef? We > don't use PQconninfoParse in many files (actually, two). So it would be > pretty easy to add the #ifdef line, so that it won't be a big issue for > packagers. Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking. Sorry for re-opening this discussion, but is my reading correct that we are *only* using it to figure out if we have libpq version 9? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: