Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi==ipPFm38nf2XnpddxPzYG=HRNEu3d4zN3mio9@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Le 24/08/2010 13:01, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> >>>> wrote: >>>>> This "disqualifies" pgAdmin3 from quite a lot of platforms. There >>>>> aren't that many that are on 8.4+ yet :-( >>>> >>>> If the packagers are willing to update pgAdmin to 1.12, it seems >>>> highly likely that they'll also update their PostgreSQL package to >>>> 8.4+ too. The distros with a conservative update policy (like Debian >>>> Stable) won't update either. >>> >>> It's probably going to make it very hard for a backports repository to >>> carry it though :( But I guess it could keep a backport of libpq as >>> well, since it's always backwards compatible. >>> >> >> Can't we just have it set a variable we could check with a #ifdef? We >> don't use PQconninfoParse in many files (actually, two). So it would be >> pretty easy to add the #ifdef line, so that it won't be a big issue for >> packagers. > > Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking. Sorry for re-opening this > discussion, but is my reading correct that we are *only* using it to > figure out if we have libpq version 9? Essentially, yes. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: