Re: git: uh-oh
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: git: uh-oh |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTini+OcZLEZEj6muHCRrnLuRNYKpsVLKkG4e8nk8@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: git: uh-oh (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: git: uh-oh
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> The fact that the file was "modified" twice after being removed at rev >>> 2.88 seems really wacko. Are you sure that's not contributing to what >>> we're seeing here? >> >> Yeah, that was discussed in the earlier git-conversion thread that I >> pointed to. We never did figure out how that happened, though I >> speculated it might have been due to weirdness in Vadim's local >> checkout. >> >> Is it possible to just delete those two revisions from the CVS >> repository, and if so would it help? We certainly don't need 'em. > > cvs admin -o ? Magnus, is this something that you can try? Prune those could of wonky revisions after the delete and before the re-add prior to running the conversion, and see how that comes out? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: