Re: git: uh-oh
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: git: uh-oh |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=oQbvAkSQesebVfCgGOR9C16+DdKQejz=8NiG0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: git: uh-oh (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: git: uh-oh
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> The fact that the file was "modified" twice after being removed at rev >> 2.88 seems really wacko. Are you sure that's not contributing to what >> we're seeing here? > > Yeah, that was discussed in the earlier git-conversion thread that I > pointed to. We never did figure out how that happened, though I > speculated it might have been due to weirdness in Vadim's local > checkout. > > Is it possible to just delete those two revisions from the CVS > repository, and if so would it help? We certainly don't need 'em. cvs admin -o ? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: