Re: do we need to postpone beta4?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: do we need to postpone beta4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinMW6kWpAN9mqTNmdZkhaUnd29RuDeoS05So2Dp@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: do we need to postpone beta4? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: do we need to postpone beta4?
Re: do we need to postpone beta4? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I think we should consider postponing beta4. I count eleven >> non-documentation, 9.0-specific bug fix on REL9_0_STABLE, but there >> are currently five items on the open 9.0 issues list, at least one of >> which appears to be a new bug in 9.0, and we just got a bug report on >> pgsql-bugs from Valentine Gogichashvili complaining of what looks to >> be a crasher in the redo path for heap_xlog_update(). It seems >> unlikely at this point that we can have all of these issues fixed and >> still have time for a full buildfarm cycle before the wrap. Does it >> make sense to put out a beta with known bugs (presumably requiring >> another beta) at this point, or should we push this off a bit? > > If we don't wrap a beta this week, the next possible window is several > weeks away, because various people will be on vacation. So I think we > should get the existing fixes out there, even if there are known bugs > remaining. A beta is not an RC. Well, that's pretty much saying we won't release before September. Which is kind of a bummer, but I guess that's what happens when we get into vacation season. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: