Re: do we need to postpone beta4?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: do we need to postpone beta4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10522.1280254262@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | do we need to postpone beta4? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: do we need to postpone beta4?
Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Re: do we need to postpone beta4? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I think we should consider postponing beta4. I count eleven > non-documentation, 9.0-specific bug fix on REL9_0_STABLE, but there > are currently five items on the open 9.0 issues list, at least one of > which appears to be a new bug in 9.0, and we just got a bug report on > pgsql-bugs from Valentine Gogichashvili complaining of what looks to > be a crasher in the redo path for heap_xlog_update(). It seems > unlikely at this point that we can have all of these issues fixed and > still have time for a full buildfarm cycle before the wrap. Does it > make sense to put out a beta with known bugs (presumably requiring > another beta) at this point, or should we push this off a bit? If we don't wrap a beta this week, the next possible window is several weeks away, because various people will be on vacation. So I think we should get the existing fixes out there, even if there are known bugs remaining. A beta is not an RC. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: