Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin3r23m-JzNp_yszjd8qFrHWLcoM9QwE=cbUg-a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 05:24, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I did s/failover/promote. Here is the updated patch. >> >> I rebased the patch to current git master. > > This patch looks fine to me. I will mark it Ready for Committer. > > (Someone else please feel free to pick it up for the actual commit, if > you have cycles.) I see that the docs part of the patch removes the mentioning of reporting servers - is that intentional, or a mistake? Seems that usecase still remains, no? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: