Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikPAh1TjLwWyEuGtGt=yoQsbsOMR3YX9BB8_Tpo@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 15:25, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 05:24, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I did s/failover/promote. Here is the updated patch. >>> >>> I rebased the patch to current git master. >> >> This patch looks fine to me. I will mark it Ready for Committer. >> >> (Someone else please feel free to pick it up for the actual commit, if >> you have cycles.) > > I see that the docs part of the patch removes the mentioning of > reporting servers - is that intentional, or a mistake? Seems that > usecase still remains, no? Also, the patch no longer applies, since it conflicts with faa0550572583f51dba25611ab0f1d1c31de559b. Since you (Fujii-san) wrote both of them, feel like rebasing it properly for current master? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: