Re: Simplifying replication
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Simplifying replication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTimx2g2s6gZ5bKo2+pjRdmEy5oh5z-Pnahj0=X0S@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Simplifying replication (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> Greg, >> >> > The way things stand you *always* need archived logs. Even if you have >> > streaming set up it might try to use archived logs if it falls too far >> > behind. >> >> Actually, you don't. If you're willing to accept possible >> desynchronization and recloning of the standbys, then you can skip the >> archive logs. > > Agreed, but as a reality check: when I proposed that wal_keep_segments > = -1 would keep all WAL segments (for use while the file system was > being backed up), I was told administrators shoud compute how much free > disk space they had. Obviously easy of use is not our #1 priority. Amen. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: