Re: Simplifying replication
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Simplifying replication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201010220022.o9M0M8Q29438@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Simplifying replication (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Simplifying replication
Re: Simplifying replication |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Greg, > > > The way things stand you *always* need archived logs. Even if you have > > streaming set up it might try to use archived logs if it falls too far > > behind. > > Actually, you don't. If you're willing to accept possible > desynchronization and recloning of the standbys, then you can skip the > archive logs. Agreed, but as a reality check: when I proposed that wal_keep_segments = -1 would keep all WAL segments (for use while the file system was being backed up), I was told administrators shoud compute how much free disk space they had. Obviously easy of use is not our #1 priority. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: